See how much investment fees are really costing you — not just what you pay, but what those fees would have grown into if they'd stayed invested. Compare fee scenarios side by side, free.
Based on the numbers below
A 1.00% annual fee could cost you over 30 years of investing.
That's not just fees paid — it's what those fees would have grown into if they'd stayed invested. Adjust any number below and watch it change instantly.
Illustrative starting points — pick one to prefill the calculator, then adjust to match your own numbers.
Your investment
Fees to compare
Adjustments
Choosing the 0.10% option over the 1.00% option puts this much more in your pocket after 30 years.
Portfolio A
1.00% feeEnding portfolio value
Portfolio B
0.10% feeEnding portfolio value
/mo
Portfolio A (1.00%) vs. Portfolio B (0.10%), with the difference shaded between them.
Portfolio A (1.00%) — how much of your balance is contributions, growth, and fees.
How the gap between Portfolio A's actual balance and a fee-free version of itself widens every year.
Common fee matchups, computed live using your current investment, contribution, return, and time horizon.
Using your current investment, contribution, return, and time horizon.
1.00% fee
$564.3K
0.03% fee
$690.3K
Difference: $126K
Using your current investment, contribution, return, and time horizon.
1.00% fee
$564.3K
0.10% fee
$680.2K
Difference: $115.9K
Using your current investment, contribution, return, and time horizon.
1.00% fee
$564.3K
0.50% fee
$625.6K
Difference: $61.3K
Using your current investment, contribution, return, and time horizon.
1.50% fee
$509.9K
1.00% fee
$564.3K
Difference: $54.4K
Generated from the numbers you entered — not generic advice.
Switching from a 1.00% fee to a 0.10% fee could put approximately $115,896 more in your pocket over 30 years.
At a 1.00% fee, you're on track to lose about 19% of your portfolio's potential value to fees alone — $130,384 that never gets the chance to compound.
The $130,384 lost to fees on your current portfolio is roughly a 20% down payment on a typical starter home.
That $115,896 difference is worth about 4.3 additional years of retirement spending, using a common 4% withdrawal guideline on your own numbers.
Lowering your fee could mean roughly $386 more in monthly income throughout retirement, using a 4% withdrawal guideline.
An expense ratio is the annual cost of owning a fund, expressed as a percent of your balance. It's not billed to you directly — it's quietly deducted from the fund's assets every day, which is exactly why it's easy to underestimate. A 0.50% expense ratio on a $50,000 balance is $250 a year, taken automatically, whether the fund goes up or down.
A management fee (usually part of the expense ratio) pays for running the fund itself — research, trading, administration. An advisory fee is separate: it pays a human or robo-advisor for managing your overall portfolio and is charged on top of whatever the underlying funds already cost. It's common to pay both at once without realizing it.
Beyond the headline expense ratio, funds can carry sales loads (a commission charged when you buy or sell), 12b-1 fees (marketing costs passed to shareholders), and transaction costs from the fund's own trading activity. Always check a fund's prospectus for the full picture, not just the number on the fact sheet.
A fee doesn't just cost you the dollar amount deducted this year. That dollar is also gone from every future year of compounding. Money paid in fees at year 5 would have kept growing for the next 25 years if it had stayed invested — which is why the true cost of a fee is always larger than the fees paid, sometimes by a wide margin.
Over a single year, the difference between a 0.10% fee and a 1.00% fee on a typical balance is a rounding error. Over 30 years of compounding, that same 0.90 percentage point gap can consume a fifth or more of your total potential wealth. Small, steady percentages are exactly the kind of thing compounding was built to amplify.
Illustrative — the same starting balance, growing at the same rate, with only the fee different. The gap widens every year because fees compound too.
An index fund doesn't try to beat the market — it just tries to match it, as cheaply as possible. Because so much of long-term return comes from simply staying invested and minimizing drag, a low-cost index fund often outperforms a more expensive actively managed alternative purely on cost, without needing to make a single 'better' investment decision.
S&P Dow Jones Indices' long-running SPIVA scorecards have repeatedly found that the large majority of actively managed U.S. funds underperform their benchmark index over 10-to-15-year periods, after fees. This is historical data about past fund performance, not a guarantee about any specific fund's future results.
"It's only 1%" undersells the impact once you factor in decades of lost compounding. "A higher fee must mean better performance" isn't supported by the long-run data above. And "I'm not paying anything, it's automatic" is exactly backwards — automatic deduction is what makes fees easy to ignore, not free.
Plain-English articles on investing, retirement are in the works in our Learning Center.
Jump back up to the calculator and adjust it to match your real situation.
Back to calculator